Ninety-two people are killed when Indian Airlines Flight 605 crashes in Bangalore, India.
Indian Airlines Flight 605: A Detailed Account of the 1990 Bangalore Airbus A320 Crash and Its Legacy
Indian Airlines Flight 605, a routine domestic passenger flight originating from Bombay (now known as Mumbai) and destined for Bangalore (now Bengaluru), tragically ended on 14 February 1990. The Airbus A320-231, registered as VT-EPN, crashed onto a local golf course while attempting its final approach and landing at Bengaluru's HAL Airport. This devastating accident resulted in the loss of 92 lives out of the 146 individuals on board, sending shockwaves through the nascent Indian aviation industry and highlighting critical challenges in new aircraft automation and crew training.
The Fateful Descent: A Critical Error in Mode Selection
The subsequent comprehensive investigation conducted by the Indian authorities revealed a series of operational missteps that directly led to the disaster. The probable cause was identified as a critical misjudgment by the pilots, who inadvertently selected the "Open descent/flight idle" control mode on the aircraft's Flight Control Unit (FCU) instead of the appropriate "Glideslope capture" mode required for a stabilized approach. This seemingly minor programming error had catastrophic consequences.
- Understanding the Modes: The Airbus A320, a pioneering aircraft known for its advanced fly-by-wire technology and sophisticated automation, offers various descent modes. "Open descent/flight idle" commands the aircraft to descend rapidly to a pre-selected altitude with the engines at idle thrust – their lowest power setting. In stark contrast, "Glideslope capture" is an essential approach mode that precisely guides the aircraft along the Instrument Landing System (ILS) glideslope, ensuring a controlled, gradual descent path for a safe landing to the runway.
- Deviating from the Flight Path: The erroneous selection caused the A320 to sink far below the intended and safe glideslope, rapidly losing altitude at an uncontrolled rate due to the flight idle setting.
- Delayed Reaction and Loss of Situational Awareness: Compounding this initial error, the flight crew critically failed to advance the throttles, which would have increased engine power, or initiate a "pull up" maneuver to gain altitude, even after multiple automated radio altimeter call-outs vocally warned them of their dangerously low height above the ground (e.g., "100 feet," "50 feet"). The investigation report explicitly stated that the crew of Flight 605 appeared to be unaware of the severe situation and the immediate danger they faced, leading to a crucial, delayed reaction during the final moments of their descent. This critical lapse in situational awareness played a significant role in the tragedy.
Sweeping Recommendations for Enhanced Aviation Safety
In the aftermath of the crash, the Indian investigation committee issued an extensive set of 62 recommendations to the Directorate General of Civil Aviation (DGCA), India's primary regulatory body for civil aviation. These recommendations aimed to address systemic issues and prevent similar incidents from recurring across the nation's aviation infrastructure.
- Operational and Investigative Improvements: Key recommendations included the imperative for time recording on Air Traffic Control (ATC) tapes, a vital measure for precise accident reconstruction and analysis. Furthermore, the committee called for the formation of several specialized investigative bodies focusing on various aviation operational issues, ensuring deeper expertise and thoroughness in future inquiries.
- Airport Infrastructure and Aircraft Design Scrutiny: Specific to the incident's location, a crash siren was recommended for Bangalore airport to alert rescue services more promptly. Broader safety evaluations were also urged, focusing on the efficacy of evacuation doors and slides in Airbus airplanes and proposing a design change for their instrument knob to enhance clarity and reduce potential for misselection.
- National Airport Safety Review: The report's overarching recommendation urged the Indian government to comprehensively evaluate every airport facility in India, ensuring adherence to the highest safety standards and infrastructure preparedness to avert future air tragedies.
The A320's Early Challenges: Pilot Concerns and Design Evolution
The Flight 605 accident also ignited a significant debate within the aviation community, drawing sharp criticism from the Indian Commercial Pilot Association (ICPA). The ICPA vehemently claimed that the newly introduced Airbus A320 possessed inherent design flaws, specifically asserting that the aircraft's advanced systems were overly complex and confusing for pilots transitioning from less automated aircraft. They contended that the crew of Flight 605 was grappling with these complexities in their desperate attempts to avert the crash.
This period marked a learning curve for the global aviation industry, grappling with the implications of highly automated "glass cockpits" and the shift from conventional manual controls to fly-by-wire systems. Pilots transitioning to the A320 often expressed concerns about the perceived "loss of feel" and the need for new paradigms in managing automation, which contributed to discussions around human-machine interface design and training methodologies.
A Catalyst for Global Safety Enhancements
The lessons learned from Indian Airlines Flight 605 unfortunately received further, tragic reinforcement less than two years later. Another Airbus A320 accident, Air Inter Flight 148, occurred in January 1992 under eerily similar circumstances, involving descent mode confusion and a controlled flight into terrain in France. These combined incidents proved to be a critical turning point for Airbus and the wider aviation industry.
In response to these twin tragedies, significant design improvements were implemented, particularly affecting the Flight Control Unit (FCU) of the Airbus A320. These enhancements aimed to make mode selection and annunciation clearer and more intuitive for pilots, thereby reducing the potential for mode confusion. Beyond physical design changes, the accidents led to a cascade of new safety recommendations globally, profoundly influencing pilot training protocols, emphasizing automation management, reinforcing the importance of maintaining robust situational awareness, and improving crew resource management (CRM) practices to prevent such errors from recurring.
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) about Indian Airlines Flight 605
- What was the primary cause of the Indian Airlines Flight 605 crash?
- The primary cause of the Indian Airlines Flight 605 crash was determined to be the flight crew's erroneous selection of the "Open descent/flight idle" control mode instead of "Glideslope capture" during the aircraft's approach to Bangalore. This critical programming error, coupled with a significant delay in recognizing the dangerous descent rate and taking corrective action, led to the aircraft descending far below its intended flight path and impacting the ground.
- What is the difference between "Open descent/flight idle" and "Glideslope capture"?
- "Open descent/flight idle" is a managed descent mode primarily used to descend efficiently to a pre-selected altitude, typically with the aircraft's engines at idle thrust. Conversely, "Glideslope capture" is an essential approach mode that precisely guides the aircraft along the Instrument Landing System (ILS) glideslope, providing the correct vertical path for a safe and controlled landing. The mistaken selection meant the aircraft was descending rapidly with minimal power, unguided by the necessary precision approach path.
- How many fatalities occurred in the Indian Airlines Flight 605 crash?
- The Indian Airlines Flight 605 crash resulted in the tragic loss of 92 lives out of the 146 passengers and crew members on board.
- Did this crash lead to any significant changes in aviation safety or aircraft design?
- Yes, the crash of Indian Airlines Flight 605, alongside a subsequent Airbus A320 accident (Air Inter Flight 148) that occurred under similar circumstances, acted as a catalyst for significant advancements in aviation safety. It led to 62 recommendations from the Indian investigative committee to the DGCA and prompted crucial design improvements, particularly to the Airbus A320's Flight Control Unit (FCU), aimed at making mode selection clearer. Furthermore, these incidents reinforced the need for enhanced pilot training in automation management, situational awareness, and crew resource management (CRM) across the global aviation industry.