In testimony before a United States Senate subcommittee, Lockheed Corporation president Carl Kotchian admits that the company had paid out approximately $3 million in bribes to the office of Japanese Prime Minister Kakuei Tanaka.
The United States Senate: A Pillar of American Governance
The United States Senate stands as the venerable upper chamber of the U.S. Congress, working in tandem with the House of Representatives, its lower counterpart. Together, these two bodies constitute the national bicameral legislature of the United States, a foundational element of the nation's system of checks and balances and representative democracy.
Structure and Evolution of the Senate
The fundamental composition and extensive powers of the Senate are meticulously outlined in Article One of the United States Constitution. Each of the fifty states is equally represented by two senators, ensuring that smaller states possess a voice equivalent to that of more populous ones, a compromise struck during the Constitutional Convention of 1787. This unique structure results in a body of 100 senators. Senators serve six-year staggered terms, meaning that approximately one-third of the Senate is up for re-election every two years. This system fosters stability and continuity within the legislative process, as it prevents a complete turnover of the chamber in any single election cycle.
Historically, from 1789 until 1913, senators were not directly elected by the populace but were instead appointed by the legislatures of the states they represented. This method, however, was often criticized for leading to political machinations, deadlocks in state legislatures, and a perceived lack of accountability to the public. The ratification of the Seventeenth Amendment in 1913 marked a pivotal shift, ushering in the direct popular election of senators, thereby significantly enhancing democratic participation and responsiveness.
Leadership and Daily Operations
The Vice President of the United States holds the distinguished role of presiding officer and President of the Senate by virtue of their office. While the Vice President typically oversees Senate proceedings, their power to vote is strictly limited to breaking tie votes among the senators. In the Vice President's absence, the Senate's daily operations are overseen by the President pro tempore, a position traditionally held by the most senior member of the political party holding the majority of seats in the Senate. This role ensures continuous leadership. Furthermore, the early 1920s saw the emergence of formal majority and minority party leadership roles, with the Senate Majority Leader now primarily responsible for managing and scheduling the legislative and executive business of the chamber, wielding significant influence over the Senate's agenda.
Distinctive Powers and Responsibilities
As the upper chamber, the Senate is endowed with several exclusive "advice and consent" powers, which underscore its unique role in American governance and its function as a check on executive power. These critical responsibilities include:
- Treaty Approval: The Senate must approve all treaties negotiated by the President with a two-thirds vote, ensuring broad consensus for international agreements.
- Confirmation of Executive and Judicial Appointments: A simple majority vote is required to confirm the President's nominations for key governmental positions. This includes Cabinet secretaries, federal judges (ranging from district courts to the prestigious Federal Supreme Court justices), flag officers (high-ranking military officials), regulatory officials overseeing various industries, ambassadors representing the U.S. abroad, and numerous other federal executive and uniformed officers.
- Electoral Duties: In the rare event that no candidate receives a majority of electoral votes for Vice President, the Senate is constitutionally mandated to elect the Vice President from the top two electoral vote recipients for that office.
- Impeachment Trials: While the House of Representatives has the sole power to impeach (formally charge) federal officials, the Senate holds the sole power to conduct impeachment trials, acting as the jury and determining guilt or innocence by a two-thirds majority vote.
Prestige and Deliberation
The Senate is widely regarded as a more deliberative and prestigious body compared to the House of Representatives. This perception stems from several structural distinctions: its longer six-year terms provide senators with greater insulation from immediate electoral pressures, fostering a more long-term perspective on policy. Its significantly smaller size (100 members versus 435 in the House) allows for more extensive debate and individualized influence. Additionally, statewide constituencies mean senators represent a broader range of interests and demographics than most House members, encouraging a more collegial and historically less partisan atmosphere, though contemporary political dynamics have sometimes challenged this tradition.
The Senate chamber itself is majestically situated in the north wing of the Capitol Building in Washington, D.C., a landmark of American democracy.
Frequently Asked Questions about the U.S. Senate
- How many senators does each state have?
- Each of the 50 U.S. states is represented by two senators, resulting in a total of 100 senators in the U.S. Senate.
- How long is a senator's term?
- A U.S. Senator serves a six-year term. Terms are staggered, meaning approximately one-third of the Senate is up for election every two years.
- How did senators used to be chosen before 1913?
- Before the ratification of the Seventeenth Amendment in 1913, senators were appointed by the legislatures of their respective states, not by popular vote.
- What is the "advice and consent" power of the Senate?
- The "advice and consent" power refers to the Senate's unique authority to approve treaties negotiated by the President and to confirm presidential appointments, including Cabinet secretaries, federal judges, ambassadors, and other high-ranking officials.
The Lockheed Bribery Scandals: A Landmark in Corporate Misconduct
The Lockheed bribery scandals represent a notorious series of illicit payments and contributions orchestrated by officials of the U.S. aerospace giant Lockheed Corporation. These clandestine operations occurred over an extended period, spanning from the late 1950s through the 1970s, and were primarily designed to secure lucrative aircraft sales contracts across the globe.
Global and Domestic Repercussions
The revelation of these scandals ignited considerable political controversy and public outrage in several key international markets where Lockheed had significant dealings. Nations such as West Germany, Italy, the Netherlands, and Japan experienced profound political fallout, with high-profile investigations, resignations of prominent officials, and a loss of public trust in government and corporate ethics. For instance, in Japan, the scandal implicated Prime Minister Kakuei Tanaka, leading to his arrest and conviction for accepting bribes.
Domestically, in the United States, the scandal pushed Lockheed Corporation to the brink of financial collapse. Already facing severe economic distress due to the commercial failure of its L-1011 TriStar airliner, a wide-body passenger jet that struggled to compete with rivals like Boeing's 747 and McDonnell Douglas's DC-10, the exposure of widespread bribery amplified the company's woes. The scandal was a major catalyst for legislative action in the U.S., directly contributing to the passage of the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA) in 1977. This landmark legislation made it illegal for U.S. companies and individuals to bribe foreign government officials to obtain or retain business, significantly reshaping international business ethics and compliance standards.
Frequently Asked Questions about the Lockheed Bribery Scandals
- What was the primary purpose of the Lockheed bribery scandals?
- The primary purpose of the bribes and contributions made by Lockheed officials was to facilitate and secure sales of their aircraft in international markets.
- Which countries were most affected by the Lockheed scandals?
- The scandals caused significant political controversy and repercussions in West Germany, Italy, the Netherlands, and Japan.
- What was the major consequence of the Lockheed scandal in the U.S.?
- In the U.S., the scandal nearly led to Lockheed's bankruptcy and was a significant impetus for the creation and passage of the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA) in 1977.
- What was the L-1011 TriStar's role in Lockheed's struggles?
- The L-1011 TriStar was a commercial airliner that experienced significant commercial failure, contributing to Lockheed's financial difficulties even before the bribery scandals became public.